Forced-Choice Recognition Tests: A Critical Review
- 1 October 1985
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Advertising
- Vol. 14 (3) , 52-58
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.1985.10672958
Abstract
Recognition measures are commonly used to test the memory effects of advertisements. Unfortunately, there is a significant amount of response bias (particularly false claiming) involved with the simple “yes”/“no” type recognition tests currently being used by the advertising researchers. Recently a different procedure, called forced-choice recognition test, has been suggested as a means of removing the response bias. The present paper briefly reviews the past attempts made by the advertising researchers to secure a valid measure of recognition memory and then evaluates the efficacy of forced-choice recognition tests as a means of eliminating response bias in an advertising context.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Correcting response measures for guessing and partial information.Psychological Bulletin, 1982
- On the use of distractors for testing recognition memory.Psychological Bulletin, 1980
- Estimating item and order informationJournal of Mathematical Psychology, 1976
- Transitory effect of number of alternatives on performance in a recognition task.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1970
- The Influence of Instructions on Respondent ErrorJournal of Marketing Research, 1970
- An examination of recognition and free recall as measures of acquisition and long-term retention.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1967
- False recognition produced by implicit verbal responses.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1965
- Alternatives in Testing Recognition MemoryNature, 1962
- Measuring exposure to advertisements.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1951
- A Controlled Recognition Technique for Measuring Magazine Advertising AudiencesJournal of Marketing, 1942