Scientific Misconduct as a Dilemma for Nursing
- 1 March 1992
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Image: the Journal of Nursing Scholarship
- Vol. 24 (1) , 51-55
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1547-5069.1992.tb00699.x
Abstract
Scientific misconduct--fabrication, falsification, plagiarism or other deviations from ethical standards--is not new or unique to any discipline. Although nurses have not been included in publicized cases of misconduct, nursing is not immune. Circumstances that may be related to misconduct such as pressures to publish and to earn tenure, inadequate supervision of young scientists, limitations of the peer review system, and excessive numbers of publications by an individual are present or could develop within the profession. Careful socialization of young scientists, modifications in tenure and promotion guidelines, and replication studies are suggested as ways to prevent misconduct within nursing.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Dingell tries againNature, 1990
- NIMH Assigns Blame for Tainted StudiesScience, 1989
- Does it work efficiently?Nature, 1989
- Random Audit of Papers ProposedScience, 1988
- First scientific fraud convictionNature, 1988
- Fraud in Biomedical ResearchNew England Journal of Medicine, 1988
- Misrepresentation and Responsibility in Medical ResearchNew England Journal of Medicine, 1987
- Harvard guidelines for avoiding fraudNature, 1982
- Chance and Consensus in Peer ReviewScience, 1981
- Peer review in biomedical publicationThe American Journal of Medicine, 1974