The efficacy of two types of cues in aphasic patients
- 1 October 1989
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Aphasiology
- Vol. 3 (7) , 619-626
- https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038908249028
Abstract
This study investigated the efficacy of two types of cues (phonemic and semantic) in aphasic patients with naming deficits. Subjects consisted of ten Broca's, ten Wernicke's, eight conduction, and eight anomic aphasic subjects. Cues were administered following failure to name on confrontation. Responsiveness to cueing was dependent on type of cue and type of aphasia. Subjects performed better on phonemic as compared to semantic cues. In addition, aphasic subgroups responded differentially, with conduction subjects responding significantly better to cueing than Wernicke's subjects. These findings are discussed with respect to the neuropsychological mechanisms involved in cueing.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Why don't Broca's aphasics cue themselves? an investigation of phonemic cueing and tip of the tongue informationNeuropsychologia, 1988
- An investigation of Luria's hypothesis on prompting in aphasic naming disturbancesJournal of Communication Disorders, 1987
- Picture-naming in aphasiaBrain and Language, 1985
- On the origin of semantic errors in naming: Evidence from the case of a global aphasicCognitive Neuropsychology, 1984
- The Effects of Cuing on Picture Naming in AphasiaCortex, 1978
- Effect of Auditory Prestimulation on Naming in AphasiaJournal of Speech and Hearing Research, 1977
- Semantic field, naming, and auditory comprehension in aphasiaBrain and Language, 1976
- Recall of Generic Properties of Words in Aphasic PatientsCortex, 1971
- Effects of trial time and inter-trial interval on naming by aphasic subjectsJournal of Communication Disorders, 1971
- Aphasic Difficulties Understanding Spoken LanguageNeurology, 1953