Comparison of soybean meal/sorghum grain, alfalfa hay and dehydrated alfalfa pellets as supplemental protein sources for beef cattle consuming dormant tallgrass-prairie forage.
- 1 January 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Journal of Animal Science
- Vol. 68 (9) , 2901-2915
- https://doi.org/10.2527/1990.6892901x
Abstract
Three experiments were conducted to compare soybean meal/sorghum grain (SBM/SG), alfalfa hay or dehydrated alfalfa pellets (DEHY) as supplemental protein sources for beef cattle grazing dormant range forage. In Exp. 1 (35-d digestion study), 16 ruminally cannulated steers were stratified by weight (average BW 259 kg) and assigned randomly within stratification to: 1) control, no supplement; 2) SBM/SG (25% CP) fed at .48% BW; 3) alfalfa hay (17% CP) fed at .70% BW; or 4) DEHY (17.4% CP) fed at .67% BW. Steers receiving protein supplements displayed at least a twofold increase in forage intake (P less than .10). In addition, steers supplemented with DEHY consumed approximately 15% more forage (P less than .10) than SBM/SG- or alfalfa hay-supplemented steers. Digestible DM intake (kg/d), however, was similar between alfalfa hay- and DEHY-supplemented steers and 20% greater (P less than .10) than for SBM/SG-supplemented steers. In Exp. 2, 82 mature, nonlactating Hereford x Angus cows (average BW 489 kg) were assigned randomly to SBM/SG, alfalfa hay or DEHY supplement treatments, which were replicated in three pastures. Cows supplemented with DEHY gained more weight (P less than .05) during the first 84 d of supplementation and displayed the least amount of weight loss at calving (d 127; P less than .05) and just prior to breeding (P less than .10). In contrast, calving interval (361 d) and pregnancy rate (94%) were unaffected (P greater than .10) by dam's previous supplemental treatment. In Exp. 3, one block (pasture) of cows from Exp. 2 was selected at random and grazing behavior was monitored during week-long periods in January and February. A treatment X time interaction (P less than .05) occurred for total time spent grazing; treatments did not differ in January, but cows supplemented with alfalfa hay spent less time grazing in the February grazing period. In conclusion, DEHY and alfalfa hay appear to be at least as effective as SBM/SG as a supplemental protein source for pregnant grazing cows when supplements are fed on an equal CP and ME basis. Copyright © . .This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- The effect of dehydroepiandrosterone on Zucker rats selected for fat food preferencePhysiology & Behavior, 2000
- Cubed Alfalfa Hay or Cottonseed Meal-Barley as Supplements for Beef Cows Grazing Fall-Winter RangeJournal of Range Management, 1986
- Effect of Time of Supplementation on Performance, Forage Intake and Grazing Behavior of Yearling Beef Steers Grazing Russian Wild Ryegrass in the FallJournal of Animal Science, 1985
- Influence of Protein Degradability in Range Supplements on Abomasal Nitrogen Flow, Nitrogen Balance and Nutrient DigestibilityJournal of Animal Science, 1985
- Evaluation of Pedometers for Measuring Distance Traveled by Cattle on Two Grazing SystemsJournal of Range Management, 1985
- Responses to protein meal supplements by lactating beef cattle given a low-quality pasture hayAustralian Journal of Agricultural Research, 1985
- Glucose production and utilization in non-pregnant, pregnant and lactating ewesBritish Journal of Nutrition, 1983
- Utilization of low quality roughages: effects of urea and protein supplements of differing solubility on digesta flows, intake and growth rate of cattle eating oaten chaffBritish Journal of Nutrition, 1980
- Investigation of chromium, cerium and cobalt as markers in digesta. Rate of passage studiesJournal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 1980
- Nutritional status and intake regulation in sheep. III. The relationship between improvement of nitrogen status and increase in voluntary intake of low-protein roughages by sheepAustralian Journal of Agricultural Research, 1965