Unmeasured Residuals in Sediment Budgets: A Cautionary Note
- 1 September 1991
- journal article
- Published by American Geophysical Union (AGU) in Water Resources Research
- Vol. 27 (9) , 2483-2486
- https://doi.org/10.1029/91wr01625
Abstract
In studies that develop sediment budgets, one or more terms (constituting up to 94% of the total budget) have been obtained by subtraction. These unmeasured residual terms incorporate not only the sediment budget components attributed to them, but also the net sum of all errors in measured components. Thus, budgets may appear to balance only because errors are hidden in the residual term. The nature of sediment measurements is such that some error is virtually certain, and in sediment budget studies where all terms have been quantified, imbalances range as high as 104% of total basin yield. Despite these potential problems, the process of constructing the budget is still informative (even when terms are obtained as residuals), because it requires sediment sources and transport pathways to be identified and quantified. However, terms obtained by subtraction should be clearly identified as such, and where possible, error analysis of all terms should be included.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Uncertainty in Phosphorus Retention, Williams Fork Reservoir, ColoradoWater Resources Research, 1985
- A sediment budget for Coon Creek basin in the Driftless Area, Wisconsin, 1853-1977American Journal of Science, 1983
- Organic Matter Budgets for Stream Ecosystems: Problems in their EvaluationPublished by Springer Nature ,1983
- Workshop on sediment budgets and routing in forested drainage basins: proceedings.Published by USDA Forest Service ,1982
- UNCERTAINTIES IN ESTIMATING THE WATER BALANCE OF LAKES1Jawra Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 1981
- A Sediment Budget and an Analysis of Geomorphic Process in the Van Duzen River Basin, North Coastal California, 1941–1975GSA Bulletin, 1980