Transparency, Price Informativeness, and Stock Return Synchronicity: Theory and Evidence
Top Cited Papers
- 20 August 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis
- Vol. 45 (5) , 1189-1220
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022109010000505
Abstract
This paper argues that, contrary to the conventional wisdom, stock return synchronicity (or R2) can increase when transparency improves. In a simple model, we show that, in more transparent environments, stock prices should be more informative about future events. Consequently, when the events actually happen in the future, there should be less “surprise” (i.e., less new information is impounded into the stock price). Thus a more informative stock price today means higher return synchronicity in the future. We find empirical support for our theoretical predictions in 3 settings: namely, firm age, seasoned equity offerings (SEOs), and listing of American Depositary Receipts (ADRs).Keywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Does international cross-listing improve the information environmentJournal of Financial Economics, 2008
- R2 around the world: New theory and new tests☆Journal of Financial Economics, 2006
- Investor attention, overconfidence and category learningPublished by Elsevier ,2006
- Stock price synchronicity and analyst coverage in emerging marketsPublished by Elsevier ,2005
- Governance Matters III: Governance Indicators for 1996, 1998, 2000, and 2002The World Bank Economic Review, 2004
- Capital Structure and TransparencySSRN Electronic Journal, 2003
- Financial markets and the allocation of capitalJournal of Financial Economics, 2000
- When an event is not an event: the curious case of an emerging marketJournal of Financial Economics, 2000
- Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bondsJournal of Financial Economics, 1993
- Dividend Innovations and Stock Price VolatilityEconometrica, 1988