Debating the Direction of Comparative Politics
- 1 January 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Comparative Political Studies
- Vol. 40 (1) , 5-31
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414006294815
Abstract
This article contributes to ongoing debates about the direction of comparative politics through an analysis of new data on the scope, objectives, and methods of research in the field. The results of the analysis are as follows. Comparative politics is a rich and diverse field that cannot be accurately characterized on the basis of just one dimension or even summarized in simple terms. In turn, the tendency to frame choices about the direction of the field in terms of a stark alternative between an old area studies approach and a new economic approach relies on largely unsupported assumptions. It is therefore advisable to focus on problematic methodological practices that, as this study shows, are widespread in comparative research and thus pose serious impediments to the production of knowledge.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Politics of the Developing AreasPublished by Walter de Gruyter GmbH ,2015
- The Perestroikan Challenge to Social SciencePolitics & Society, 2003
- Paradigms and Sand CastlesPublished by University of Michigan Library ,2003
- Revolution or Contribution? Rational Choice Approaches in the Study of Latin American PoliticsLatin American Politics and Society, 2002
- Quantitative Cross-national Research MethodsPublished by Elsevier ,2001
- The Economic Turn in Comparative PoliticsComparative Political Studies, 2000
- Comparative Political Science: An Inventory and Assessment since the 1980'sPS: Political Science and Politics, 1999
- Toward a Political Science DisciplineComparative Political Studies, 1998
- Designing Social InquiryPublished by Walter de Gruyter GmbH ,1994
- Macrocomparative Research MethodsAnnual Review of Sociology, 1993