SUPRA VAGINAL UTERINE AMPUTATION WITH PEROPERATIVE ELECTROCOAGULATION OF ENDOCERVICAL MUCOSA
- 11 January 1985
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica
- Vol. 64 (2) , 175-177
- https://doi.org/10.3109/00016348509154713
Abstract
Discussion on the advantages of abdominal hysterectomy versus supravaginal uterine amputation has concentrated on the incidence of carcinoma in the remaining stump, mortality, and other serious complications. During the period 1952‐78 we have performed 2712 supravaginal amputations with peroperative electrocoagulation of en‐docervical mucosa. The incidence of stump carcinoma was 0.11% in this material. In our prospective studies we have shown that supravaginal amputation has certain advantages over abdominal hysterectomy as regards long‐term morbidity. In this paper we describe the method we are using when performing supravaginal uterine amputation.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Supra Vaginal Uterine Amputation VS. HysterectomyActa Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 1983
- Supra Vaginal Uterine Amputation VS. HysterectomyActa Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 1983
- Peroperative Electrocoagulation of Endocervical Mucosa and Later Carcinoma of the Cervical StumpActa Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 1982
- Supra-vaginal uterine amputation vs. abdominal hysterectomy: The effects on urinary symptoms with special reference to pollakisuria, nocturia and dysuriaMaturitas, 1981
- Risk of cervical cancer among an electrocoagulated populationAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1978
- EFFECT OF A MASS SCREENING PROGRAM ON THE RISK OF CERVICAL CANCERAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 1976
- On Excision of the Cervical Canal in Conjunction with Uterus AmputationActa Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 1949