Patient dose in radiologically guided interventional vascular procedures: conventional versus digital systems.

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
PURPOSE: To calculate the difference in the patient radiation dose in radiologically guided interventional vascular procedures between conventional and digital systems and to estimate the effective dose and the energy imparted with the digital system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 318 procedures (in 318 patients) in 15 different examination groups were analyzed. The dose-area product was determined by using a transmission chamber fitted to an x-ray-tube light-beam diaphragm; the effective dose was determined by using software. RESULTS: Urinary and biliary tract procedures showed small differences in the average dose-area product between conventional and digital systems. The dose-area products in the vascular procedures were higher with the digital than with the conventional system. The average effective dose and energy imparted were 0.88 mSv and 129 mJ, respectively, in the subcutaneous placement of a reservoir for analgesic administration and as much as 25.7 mSv and 829 mJ, respectively, in spermatic vein embolization. CONCLUSION: The dose-area product was higher with the digital system than with the conventional system in 13 of the 15 groups. To reduce the patient dose in vascular interventional radiology procedures, the training of personnel and the frequent use of conventional fluoroscopy and low-dose imaging are required.