The utility of specific immunoglobulin E measurements in primary care
- 9 July 2004
- Vol. 59 (s78) , 35-41
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1398-9995.2004.00566.x
Abstract
The identification of atopic patients may not be considered a necessary step in the diagnosis process in primary care. This study investigated the impact of the addition of a specific immunoglobulin E (IgE) antibody test on the current management by primary-care physicians of patients with respiratory and skin symptoms. The study had a prospective before-after design. It was conducted in two geographic areas of Italy and Spain and consisted of two parts, Part I and Part II. In each part patients were recruited according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. After the clinical examination, the patients were classified into one of the following categories using a physician's classification: allergic, nonallergic or uncertain. A blood sample was taken from each included patient for specific IgE antibody determination using a Pharmacia CAP System, including either Phadiatop Infant (0-5 years of age) or Phadiatop and food mix (fx5e) (>5 years of age). If a positive result was found, an additional 6-26 specific IgE tests were performed. In Part I the result of the specific IgE antibody determinations was not available before the physician's classification was made. In contrast, in Part II, the result of the IgE test was available at the time when the physician's classification was made. Between Part I and Part II an educational intervention for physicians to improve their knowledge of blood testing for IgE-mediated allergy was carried out. A total of 721 patients were included in the study. The agreement between classifications based on clinical data and IgE antibody results changed from a kappa coefficient of 0.13 in Part I to 0.86 in Part II. With regard to the allergic status the proportion of uncertain cases was reduced from 26.3% in Part I to 4.1% in Part II. The proportion of patients that were advised to avoid allergens increased from 18% in Part I to 62% in Part II in the group of patients classified both by the clinician and the IgE test. The use of specific IgE antibody determinations improves the clinical management of patients with allergy related symptoms in primary care, allowing advice to be given on specific allergen avoidance. However, the applicability of this diagnostic tool in different areas and countries should be further assessed in cost-effectiveness studies.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Process of Care for Medicaid-Enrolled Children With AsthmaMedical Care, 2002
- Synergism between allergens and viruses and risk of hospital admission with asthma: case-control studyBMJ, 2002
- Systematic review: Exposure to pets and risk of asthma and asthma-like symptomsJournal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 2001
- Efficacy of a single diagnostic test for sensitization to common inhalant allergensAnnals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology, 2001
- Trends in the cost of illness for asthma in the United States, 1985-1994Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 2000
- Allergic factors associated with the development of asthma and the influence of cetirizine in a double‐blind, randomised, placebo‐controlled trial: First results of ETA®Pediatric Allergy and Immunology, 1998
- The diagnosis of allergic rhinitis: how to combine the medical history with the results of radioallergosorbent tests and skin prick testsScandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care, 1998
- The distribution of total and specific serum IgE in the European Community Respiratory Health Survey☆, ☆☆, ★Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 1997
- The respiratory effects of reduction of mite allergen in the bedrooms of asthmatic children — a double‐blind controlled trialClinical and Experimental Allergy, 1996
- Increase of asthma, allergic rhinitis and eczema in Swedish schoolchildren between 1979 and 1991Clinical and Experimental Allergy, 1995