Are attempts to have impaired children justifiable?
Open Access
- 1 October 2002
- journal article
- current controversy
- Published by BMJ in Journal of Medical Ethics
- Vol. 28 (5) , 286-288
- https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.28.5.286
Abstract
In a recent case, artificial insemination was employed by a couple in an attempt to ensure the birth of a deaf child. In response to this, I argue that individuals should not be allowed to select for or against deafness. While I establish that preferences for deaf children can be inherently just, allowing individuals to secure these preferences may have unacceptable consequences for existing persons who are deaf. I show that these follow even granting this couple's contestable understanding of the deaf as a minority group.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Sex selection and disability avoidance: is their opposed treatment conceptually consistent?Monash Bioethics Review, 2002
- Procreative Beneficence: Why We Should Select the Best ChildrenBioethics, 2001
- Do Deaf People See Better? Texture Segmentation and Visual Search Compensate in Adult but Not in Juvenile SubjectsJournal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 1999
- Models of disablement, universalism and the international classification of impairments, disabilities and handicapsSocial Science & Medicine, 1999
- Deaf Culture, Cochlear Implants, and Elective DisabilityHastings Center Report, 1998
- Genetic dilemmas and the child's right to an open future.1997