Mega-trials vs. meta-analysis: Precision vs. heterogeneity?
- 31 May 2007
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by Elsevier in Contemporary Clinical Trials
- Vol. 28 (3) , 324-328
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2006.11.007
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Where now for meta-analysis?International Journal of Epidemiology, 2002
- Discrepancies between Meta-Analyses and Subsequent Large Randomized, Controlled TrialsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1997
- Large trials vs meta-analysis of smaller trials: how do their results compare?Published by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1996
- ISIS-4: A randomised factorial trial assessing early oral captopril, oral mononitrate, and intravenous magnesium sulphate in 58 050 patients with suspected acute myocardial infarctionThe Lancet, 1995
- Exploratory or analytic meta-analysis: Should we distinguish between them?Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1995
- Threatening arrhythmias in acute myocardial infarction are prevented by intravenous magnesium sulfateAmerican Heart Journal, 1989
- Magnesium in the prevention of lethal arrhythmias in acute myocardial infarctionArchives of internal medicine (1960), 1987
- Intravenous infusion of magnesium sulphate after acute myocardial infarction: effects on arrhythmias and mortalityInternational Journal of Cardiology, 1986
- INTRAVENOUS MAGNESIUM IN ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTIONThe Lancet, 1986
- Why do we need some large, simple randomized trials?Statistics in Medicine, 1984