The problems of rubber hypersensitivity (Types I and IV) in chronic leg ulcer and stasis eczema patients
- 1 August 1999
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Contact Dermatitis
- Vol. 41 (2) , 89-93
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0536.1999.tb06232.x
Abstract
The prevalence of Type I and Type IV hypersensitivity to rubber allergens in patients with stasis eczema and/or venous leg ulcers over an 18‐month period was studied by prick and patch testing. Results from 109 patients were analysed. Positive patch tests were found in 71 patients (65%). Delayed‐type hypersensitivity to rubber chemicals was found in 17 patients (15.6%). However, only 1 patient who had additional risk factors showed Type I hypersensitivity to natural rubber latex. We therefore conclude that, although Type IV hypersensitivity to rubber chemicals is relatively common in our patients, Type I hypersensitivity to natural rubber latex remains rare.Keywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Latex allergyJournal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 1998
- The relationship between latex skin prick test responses and clinical allergic responsesJournal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 1996
- Allergic contact dermatitis from latex rubberBritish Journal of Dermatology, 1996
- Allergic contact dermatitis from latex rubberBritish Journal of Dermatology, 1996
- Occupational allergic contact dermatitis and anaphylaxis from rubber latexContact Dermatitis, 1992
- Contact dermatitis in patients with leg ulcersContact Dermatitis, 1988
- Contact urticaria from rubber gloves after dermatitis from thiuramsContact Dermatitis, 1984
- Contact urticaria to rubberBritish Journal of Dermatology, 1979