Hemopoietic Progenitor Cell Mobilization and Harvest Following an Intensive Chemotherapy Debulking in Indolent Lymphoma Patients
- 1 January 1999
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in The International Journal of Cell Cloning
- Vol. 17 (1) , 55-61
- https://doi.org/10.1002/stem.170055
Abstract
An in vivo purging with intensive debulking chemotherapy prior to peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) collection may reduce the risk of tumor contamination of the harvest products; however, it is usually associated with a marked reduction in PBPC mobilization. These issues have been considered while designing an adapted version of the high‐dose sequential regimen for patients with lymphoid malignancies and bone marrow involvement. To reduce tumor contamination risks, PBPC collection was postponed to the end of the high‐dose phase; however, in order to enhance progenitor cell mobilization, a chemotherapy‐free lag period was introduced prior to the final mobilizing course. Thirty‐nine patients (median age 47 years, range 26‐62) with previously untreated indolent lymphoma entered this pilot study; all had advanced‐stage disease, and 29 had overt marrow involvement. Sufficient numbers of PBPC to perform autograft with safety were harvested in 34 patients, with a median of 3 (range 2‐5) leukaphereses. A median of 14.8 × 106 (range 2‐51) CD34+/kg and 32.6 × 104 (range 1.77‐250) colony forming units‐granulocyte/macrophage/kg were collected per patient. In univariate analysis, the duration of the chemotherapy‐free interval prior to the final mobilizing course, i.e. > or <65 days, was the most significant variable influencing progenitor mobilization. These data suggest that extensive in vivo tumor debulking is feasible provided that a sufficient chemotherapy‐free period preceding the mobilizing course is allowed in order to allow a full recovery of marrow functions.Keywords
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- High-Dose Chemotherapy and Autologous Bone Marrow Transplantation Compared with MACOP-B in Aggressive B-Cell LymphomaNew England Journal of Medicine, 1997
- Impaired Stem Cell Collection by Consecutive Courses of High-Dose Mobilizing Chemotherapy Using Cyclophosphamide, Etoposide, and G-CSFJournal of Hematotherapy, 1996
- Towards a cure in indolent lymphoproliferative diseases?European Journal Of Cancer, 1995
- Haematological support of high-dose sequential chemotherapy: Clinical evidence for reduction of toxicity and high response rates in poor risk lymphomasAnnals of Oncology, 1995
- Both early and committed haemopoietic progenitors are more frequent in peripheral blood than in bone marrow during mobilization induced by high‐dose chemotherapy + G‐CSFBritish Journal of Haematology, 1995
- Peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) collected after recombinant granulocyte colony stimulating factor (rhG‐CSF): an analysis of factors correlating with the tempo of engraftment after transplantationBritish Journal of Haematology, 1994
- The Risk of Tumor Cell Contamination in Peripheral Blood Stem Cell CollectionsJournal of Hematotherapy, 1992
- Immunologic Purging of Marrow Assessed by PCR before Autologous Bone Marrow Transplantation for B-Cell LymphomaNew England Journal of Medicine, 1991
- GRANULOCYTE-MACROPHAGE COLONY-STIMULATING FACTOR TO HARVEST CIRCULATING HAEMOPOIETIC STEM CELLS FOR AUTOTRANSPLANTATIONThe Lancet, 1989
- High dose chemo-radiotherapy for sensitive tumors: Is sequential better than concurrent drug delivery?European Journal of Cancer and Clinical Oncology, 1989