TRIAL COURTS‘ RESPONSES TO SUPREME COURT POLICY CHANGES
- 1 April 1982
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Law & Policy
- Vol. 4 (2) , 215-234
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9930.1982.tb00273.x
Abstract
This is an exploratory study focusing on the response of federal district courts to Supreme Court changes in three policy areas: economic regulation, civil liberties, and criminal justice. An analysis of federal district court opinions published in the Federal Supplement before and after the Supreme Court decisions announcing the policy changes indicated that opinion‐writing patterns of federal district judges changed in a manner consistent with the Supreme Court's new direction. Further study of the federal district courts' role in the policy process is recommended and suggestions for such research are made.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- DO LOWER COURTS ANTICIPATE CHANGES IN SUPREME COURT POLICIES?: A Few Empirical NotesLaw & Policy, 1981
- Lower Court Reactions to Supreme Court Decisions: A Quantitative ExaminationAmerican Journal of Political Science, 1979
- Political Correlates of the Behavior of Federal District Judges: A "Best Case" AnalysisThe Journal of Politics, 1978
- Public Opinion and Federal Judicial PolicyAmerican Journal of Political Science, 1977
- A Note Concerning Partisan Influences on Trial-Judge Decision MakingLaw & Society Review, 1972
- Chief Justice Taft and the Lower Court Bureaucracy: A Study in Judicial AdministrationThe Journal of Politics, 1962
- Chief Justice Taft and the Lower Court Bureaucracy: A Study in Judicial AdministrationThe Journal of Politics, 1962