Bivalirudin for Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 23 November 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 355 (21) , 2203-2216
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa062437
Abstract
Current guidelines for patients with moderate- or high-risk acute coronary syndromes recommend an early invasive approach with concomitant antithrombotic therapy, including aspirin, clopidogrel, unfractionated or low-molecular-weight heparin, and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors. We evaluated the role of thrombin-specific anticoagulation with bivalirudin in such patients. We assigned 13,819 patients with acute coronary syndromes to one of three antithrombotic regimens: unfractionated heparin or enoxaparin plus a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor, bivalirudin plus a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor, or bivalirudin alone. The primary end points were a composite ischemia end point (death, myocardial infarction, or unplanned revascularization for ischemia), major bleeding, and the net clinical outcome, defined as the combination of composite ischemia or major bleeding. Bivalirudin plus a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor, as compared with heparin plus a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor, was associated with noninferior 30-day rates of the composite ischemia end point (7.7% and 7.3%, respectively), major bleeding (5.3% and 5.7%), and the net clinical outcome end point (11.8% and 11.7%). Bivalirudin alone, as compared with heparin plus a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor, was associated with a noninferior rate of the composite ischemia end point (7.8% and 7.3%, respectively; P=0.32; relative risk, 1.08; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.93 to 1.24) and significantly reduced rates of major bleeding (3.0% vs. 5.7%; P<0.001; relative risk, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.43 to 0.65) and the net clinical outcome end point (10.1% vs. 11.7%; P=0.02; relative risk, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.77 to 0.97). In patients with moderate- or high-risk acute coronary syndromes who were undergoing invasive treatment with glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, bivalirudin was associated with rates of ischemia and bleeding that were similar to those with heparin. Bivalirudin alone was associated with similar rates of ischemia and significantly lower rates of bleeding. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00093158.)Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Predictors and 1-year outcome of major bleeding in patients with non–ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: Insights from the Canadian Acute Coronary Syndrome RegistriesAmerican Heart Journal, 2005
- Routine vs Selective Invasive Strategies in Patients With Acute Coronary SyndromesJAMA, 2005
- Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage strategY (ACUITY) trial: Study design and rationaleAmerican Heart Journal, 2004
- Relationship of Blood Transfusion and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Acute Coronary SyndromesJAMA, 2004
- Long-term Efficacy of Bivalirudin and Provisional Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Blockade vs Heparin and Planned Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Blockade During Percutaneous Coronary RevascularizationREPLACE-2 Randomized TrialJAMA, 2004
- Predictors of major bleeding in acute coronary syndromes: the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE)European Heart Journal, 2003
- Bivalirudin and Provisional Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Blockade Compared With Heparin and Planned Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Blockade During Percutaneous Coronary InterventionJAMA, 2003
- Management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevationEuropean Heart Journal, 2002
- ACC/AHA Guideline Update for the Management of Patients With Unstable Angina and Non–ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction—2002: Summary ArticleCirculation, 2002
- The TIMI Risk Score for Unstable Angina/Non–ST Elevation MIJAMA, 2000