Alteration of interleukin-1 activity and the acute phase response in adjuvant arthritic rats treated with disease modifying antirheumatic drugs

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Interleukin-1 (IL-1) activity and the acute phase response, as measured by plasma CRP and iron, were used to determine if the standard disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), gold, chloroquine andd-penicillamine had a common profile of activity in the adjuvant arthritic (AA) rat. All drugs were tested at a dose which significantly reduced noninjected paw swelling in AA rats. Inhibition of paw edema ranged from 37% ford-penicillamine (100 mg/kg) to 69% for auranofin (10 mg/kg). Two week medication of AA rats with gold sodium thiomalate (GST, 10 mg/kg, i.m.) or auranofin (10 mg/kg, p.o.) resulted in a significant decrease in splenic IL-1 activity, as measured in the standard lymphocyte activating factor (LAF) assay. The acute phase response, often associated with elevated IL-1 activity, was also significantly reduced following treatment of AA rats with 10 mg/kg of GST or auranofin (oral gold). Inhibition of the acute phase response by gold was determined by a significant reduction of plasma CRP levels (56–71% reduction) and enhancement of plasma iron levels (27–52% enhancement). In contrast to the effect of GST and auranofin on IL-1, CRP and iron, treatment with chloroquine (20, 30 and 35 mg/kg) andd-penicillamine (55 and 100 mg/kg) failed to reduce the acute phase response (as measured by plasma CRP and iron) or alter LAF activity from AA rat spleen cell supernatants. Based on its ability to reduce LAF activity in spleen cell supernatants and reduce the acute phase response, it is possible that the activity of gold in the AA rat may in part be due to its ability to inhibit IL-1 productionin vivo. The inability of chloroquine andd-penicillamine to alter LAF activity and the acute phase response in AA rats does not preclude their possession of an immunoregulatory mechanism of action, but it does indicate that their mechanism of action in the AA rat probably differs from that of GST and auranofin.