Assessment of coronary calcification by electron-beam computed tomography in symptomatic patients with normal, abnormal or equivocal exercise stress test

Open Access
Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Aims Exercise stress testing is often used as the initial non-invasive diagnostic test in symptomatic patients with suspected obstructive coronary artery disease. Positive standard ECG criteria are quite specific for obstructive coronary artery disease, but there may be a substantial number of false negative tests, including patients with severe coronary artery disease. Also, exercise stress tests frequently yield equivocal results. Instead of detecting the functional consequences, electron-beam computed tomography visualized atherosclerotic plaque disease directly, but its relationship to functional testing has not been clearly delineated. It was the aim of the current study to examine electron-beam computed tomography for the identification of obstructive coronary artery disease in patients with a normal, abnormal, or equivocal exercise stress test. Methods and Results Symptomatic patients referred for coronary angiography were prospectively included in a consecutive manner if they had no prior diagnosis of coronary artery disease and an unremarkable resting ECG. All patients underwent both exercise stress test and electron-beam computed tomography on the day before coronary angiography. Standard protocols and ECG criteria to diagnose inducible ischaemia were used for the exercise stress test. The electron-beam computed tomography-derived total calcium score was computed according to standard Agatston criteria. Of the 323 patients (mean age, 55±11 years; 77% male), 179 (55%) had obstructive coronary artery disease, defined angiographically as luminal diameter narrowing ≥50%. A normal exercise stress test was documented in 105 patients (32·5%), an abnormal exercise stress test (‘diagnostic for ischaemia’) in 113 (35%), and an equivocal exercise stress test (‘inadequate exercise or non-diagnostic ECG-changes’) in 105 (32·5%). Multivariate analysis indicated that exercise stress test and electron-beam computed tomography yielded independent information for predicting obstructive coronary artery disease. Sensitivity, specificity and overall accuracy of the exercise stress test were 71%, 75% and 73%, respectively, if equivocal tests were not included, and 50%, 84% and 65% if they were included. Irrespective of the cutpoint regarded as ‘positive’, the overall accuracy of the electron-beam computed tomography-derived calcium score remained approximately 80% in patients with a normal, abnormal or equivocal exercise stress test. In patients with an equivocal and—to a lesser degree—with a normal exercise stress test, electron-beam computed tomography was able to significantly improve classification regarding obstructive coronary artery disease. Electron-beam computed tomography added no incremental predictive value in patients with an abnormal exercise stress test. Conclusion In patients who are judged to have an intermediate post-test probability of disease after exercise stress test, electron-beam computed tomography scanning may be a meaningful strategy for further stratification regarding the likelihood of obstructive coronary artery disease.

This publication has 0 references indexed in Scilit: