Treatment of advanced colorectal carcinoma with oxaliplatin and capecitabine
- 20 January 2004
- Vol. 100 (3) , 531-537
- https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.11925
Abstract
BACKGROUND The current study was designed to evaluate the antitumor activity and toxicity of capecitabine and oxaliplatin in previously untreated patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma. The primary endpoint of the study was to determine the objective response rate, and a secondary endpoint was to measure the time to disease progression. METHODS A 2‐stage trial was planned with an accrual goal of 35 patients. The treatment included oxaliplatin given at a dose of 130 mg/m2 on Day 1 of each 3‐week cycle. Initially, capecitabine at a dose of 2000 mg/m2/day in 2 divided doses was given on Days 1–14 of each cycle, but this was reduced to a dose of 1500 mg/m2/day because of toxicity. Patients were followed by computed tomography scans every two cycles to evaluate treatment response, and toxicity was monitored. RESULTS The first 13 patients on the trial received the higher dose of capecitabine. Although 5 responses (38.5%) were noted, 5 patients were hospitalized with diarrhea and dehydration. This toxicity led to a decrease in the dose of capecitabine to 1500 mg/m2/day and an additional 35 patients were treated. At the lower dose, the partial response rate was 37.1% (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 21.5–55.1%). The estimated median progression‐free survival was 6.9 months (95% CI, 4.4–8.2 months). At the lower dose, four patients were hospitalized with diarrhea/dehydration (with one death reported), one with febrile neutropenia, and one with ventricular fibrillation. Overall, Grade (according to version 2.0 of the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria) 3‐4 diarrhea was reported to develop in 20% of those patients treated at the capecitabine dose of 1500 mg/m2/day compared with 62% of patients treated at the dose of 2000 mg/m2/day. CONCLUSIONS The combination of oxaliplatin and capecitabine is an active and convenient regimen for the treatment of patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma and should be compared with other front‐line regimens as therapy for disease. Cancer 2004. © 2003 American Cancer Society.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cancer Statistics, 2003CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 2003
- Bolus Fluorouracil and Leucovorin With Oxaliplatin as First-Line Treatment in Metastatic Colorectal CancerJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2002
- Capecitabine (Xeloda®) in combination with oxaliplatin: a phase I, dose-escalation study in patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumorsAnnals of Oncology, 2002
- Phase II Study of Capecitabine and Oxaliplatin in First- and Second-Line Treatment of Advanced or Metastatic Colorectal CancerJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2002
- First-line oral capecitabine therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer: a favorable safety profile compared with intravenous5-fluorouracil/leucovorinAnnals of Oncology, 2002
- Comparison of Oral Capecitabine Versus Intravenous Fluorouracil Plus Leucovorin as First-Line Treatment in 605 Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Results of a Randomized Phase III StudyJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2001
- Irinotecan plus Fluorouracil and Leucovorin for Metastatic Colorectal CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 2000
- Leucovorin and Fluorouracil With or Without Oxaliplatin as First-Line Treatment in Advanced Colorectal CancerJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2000
- Oxaliplatin clinical activity: a reviewCritical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology, 2000
- Randomised trial of irinotecan plus supportive care versus supportive care alone after fluorouracil failure for patients with metastatic colorectal cancerThe Lancet, 1998