How reliably can compact chemistry analyzers measure lipids?
- 2 March 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in JAMA
- Vol. 263 (9) , 1245-1249
- https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.263.9.1245
Abstract
Five compact chemistry analyzers were evaluated for the measurement of lipids. Fresh plasma or serum specimens from a standardized research laboratory were assayed for total cholesterol on all five analyzers. Triglycerides and highdensity lipoprotein cholesterol were assayed on the three analyzers that could measure both of these analytes. Study results were interpreted by assessing accuracy and precision and by defining the percentage of patient specimens classified in the same categories as the reference laboratory, according to National Cholesterol Education Program guidelines. Two analyzers met standards for accuracy of cholesterol measurement. Three analyzers met performance standards for precision of cholesterol measurement. Agreement with National Cholesterol Education Program classification of specimens compared with the reference laboratory for total cholesterol ranged from 73% to 96% and was less for indirect low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. We conclude that under controlled conditions, compact chemistry analyzers vary in the reliability of lipid determination and classification of patients. (JAMA. 1990;263:1245-1249)This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Lipid alterations and decline in the incidence of coronary heart disease in the Helsinki Heart StudyJAMA, 1988
- Bias and precision of cholesterol analysis by physician's office analyzers.Clinical Chemistry, 1987
- Evaluation of a laboratory system intended for use in physicians' offices. II. Reliability of results produced by health care workers without formal or professional laboratory trainingJAMA, 1987
- Automated enzymatic standardized lipid analyses for plasma and lipoprotein fractionsClinica Chimica Acta; International Journal of Clinical Chemistry, 1987
- Hemoglobin, electrolytes, and other major clinical laboratory analytes as measured with a physician's office analyzer, the Kodak DT60.Clinical Chemistry, 1986
- The method of determination must be considered in interpreting blood cholesterol levelsJAMA, 1986
- Overall and coronary heart disease mortality rates in relation to major risk factors in 325,348 men screened for the MRFITAmerican Heart Journal, 1986
- Factors of Risk in the Development of Coronary Heart Disease—Six-Year Follow-up ExperienceAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1961