Problems in the colonoscopic localization of tumors: Continued value of the barium enema
- 1 December 1987
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Gastrointestinal Radiology
- Vol. 12 (1) , 343-346
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01885178
Abstract
Six patients in whom errors of diagnosis and therapy occurred because of reliance on colonoscopic tumor localization are presented. Three of the patients required a second laparotomy for surgical resection of a tumor that was missed at the first exploration. While endoscopy is regarded as the diagnostic gold standard, there are problems in its use for colonoscopic localization. Reliance on distance measurements may be misleading. Anatomical variants can be confusing. For this reason, a preoperative barium enema for precise delineation and localization of tumors is recommended. When a barium enema is not feasible, such as when a malignant polyp has been removed endoscopically, preoperative endoscopic localization with injection of India ink or intraoperative colonoscopy must be performed.This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Flexible fiberoptic sigmoidoscopy and double-contrast barium-enema examination in the identification of adenomas and carcinoma of the colonDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 1983
- Surveillance Intervals after Colonoscopic PolypectomyEndoscopy, 1982
- A Prospective Study of Diagnostic Methods in Adenoma Follow-upEndoscopy, 1982
- Double contrast enema and colonoscopy in polyp detection.Gut, 1981
- Double-contrast enema examination for detection of rectal carcinoma.Radiology, 1981
- Sensitivity of double-contrast barium enema: emphasis on polyp detectionAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 1980
- COLONOSCOPY IN THE DETECTION OF CARCINOMA OF THE INTESTINE1979
- Polypoid Colonic Lesions Undetected by EndoscopyRadiology, 1978
- Operative ColonoscopyBMJ, 1973
- Intraoperative Fiberoptic ColonoscopyArchives of Surgery, 1973