Neutrality, a Really Dead Concept?
- 1 June 1999
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Cooperation and Conflict
- Vol. 34 (2) , 115-139
- https://doi.org/10.1177/00108369921961807
Abstract
Identity, norms, and values have become some of the most discussed topics in the field of international relations. Surprisingly, at the same time, neutrality has almost disappeared from the academic agenda on European security. Its discourse has narrowed down to mainstream discussions about NATO enlargement and military crisis management. Neutrality is not seriously discussed anymore, but seen as a relic from the Cold War, hampering participation in collective security endeavors. Concentrating on neutrality's political core rather than on its legal obligations, and differentiating its realistic functions from its idealistic ones, I argue that neutrality still offers an interesting alternative to security identities based on membership in military alliances. Its role conceptions provide clear guidelines for constructive participation of neutral states in multilateral security frameworks such as the EU's Common Foreign and Security Policy and NATO's Partnership for Peace initiative.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- NATO's Post-Cold War Collective Action ProblemInternational Security, 1998
- NATO expansion and Russian national interestsEuropean Security, 1998
- Europe's Uncommon Foreign PolicyInternational Security, 1997
- NATO's combined joint task forces in theory and practiceSurvival, 1996
- The politics and ethics of military interventionSurvival, 1995
- The flawed logic of NATO expansionSurvival, 1995
- Compromising WestphaliaInternational Security, 1995
- Neutrality beyond the Cold WarReview of International Studies, 1993
- Reinventing Collective Security after the Cold War and Gulf ConflictPolitical Science Quarterly, 1993
- Two Concepts of RulesThe Philosophical Review, 1955