Redox Regulation of Precursor Cell Function: Insights and Paradoxes

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Studies on oligodendrocytes, the myelin-forming cells of the central nervous system, and on the progenitor cells from which they are derived, have provided several novel insights into the role of intracellular redox state in cell function. This review discusses our findings indicating that intracellular redox state is utilized by the organism as a means of regulating the balance between progenitor cell division and differentiation. This regulation is achieved in part through cell-intrinsic differences that modify the response of cells to extracellular signaling molecules, such that cells that are slightly more reduced are more responsive to inducers of cell survival and division and less responsive to inducers of differentiation or cell death. Cells that are slightly more oxidized, in contrast, show a greater response to inducers of differentiation or cell death, but less response to inducers of proliferation or survival. Regulation is also achieved by the ability of exogenous signaling molecules to modify intracellular redox state in a highly predictable manner, such that signaling molecules that promote self-renewal make progenitor cells more reduced and those that promote differentiation make cells more oxidized. In both cases, the redox changes induced by exposure to exogenous signaling molecules are a necessary component of their mode of action. Paradoxically, the results obtained through studies on the oligodendrocyte lineage are precisely the opposite of what might be predicted from a large number of studies demonstrating the ability of reactive oxidative species to enhance the effects of signaling through receptor tyrosine kinase receptors and to promote cell proliferation. Taken in sum, available data demonstrate clearly the existence of two distinct programs of cellular responses to changes in oxidative status. In one of these, becoming even slightly more oxidized is sufficient to inhibit proliferation and induce differentiation. In the second program, similar changes enhance proliferation. It is not yet clear how cells can interpret putatively identical signals in such opposite manners, but it does already seem clear that resolving this paradox will provide insights of considerable relevance to the understanding of normal development, tissue repair, and tumorigenesis.

This publication has 83 references indexed in Scilit: