Ethnic differences in midwife-attended US births.
- 1 July 1994
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Public Health Association in American Journal of Public Health
- Vol. 84 (7) , 1139-1141
- https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.84.7.1139
Abstract
This study examined US ethnic differences in midwifery care from 1982 through 1989. After adjustment for maternal characteristics, Native American mothers were most likely, ina White and Asian mothers were least likely, to obtain midwifery care. For these three groups, midwifery use increased rapidly in the period from 1982 through 1989. Compared With white mothers, Black and Hispanic mothers were more likely to be :attended by a midwife; however, their-use of midwives increased more slowly.,Though the local availability of obstetricians and midwives may determine a woman's choice of care provider, these data suggest that cultural factors also play a role.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Where babies are born and who attends their births: findings from the revised 1989 United States Standard Certificate of Live Birth.1993
- The role of selection bias in comparing cesarean birth rates between physician and midwifery management.1992
- The transformation of American midwifery: 1975 to 1988.American Journal of Public Health, 1992
- Nurse-midwifery practice in the United States, 1982 and 1987.American Journal of Public Health, 1989
- CERTIFIED NURSE-MIDWIFE EFFECTIVENESS IN THE HEALTH MAINTENANCE ORGANIZATION OBSTETRIC TEAM1989
- Reducing low birth weight among socioeconomically high-risk adolescent pregnancies successful intervention with certified nurse-midwife-managed care and a multidisciplinary teamJournal of Nurse-Midwifery, 1985
- San Francisco General Hospital nurse-midwifery practice: The first thousand birthsAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1981
- Effectiveness of certified nurse-midwivesAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1976
- Reducing neonatal mortality rate with nurse-midwivesAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1971