AN OPEN, RANDOMISED, PARALLEL GROUP STUDY OF LACTULOSE VERSUS ISPAGHULA IN THE TREATMENT OF CHRONIC CONSTIPATION IN ADULTS
- 1 March 1991
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wiley in International Journal Of Clinical Practice
- Vol. 45 (1) , 28-30
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-1241.1991.tb08818.x
Abstract
SUMMARY The efficacy, tolerance and acceptability of lactulose (Duphalac) and ispaghula (Fybogel Orange) were assessed in the treatment of chronic constipation in adults. In an open, prospectively randomised, parallel group study, 124 patients with a history of constipation for more than three weeks were treated with either 15 ml bd of lactulose (increasing to 60 ml daily if necessary) or one sachet bd of ispaghula. Over the four‐week treatment period both treatments were shown to be effective, and numbers of concurrent effects were similar between the two groups. Differences were demonstrated with regard to acceptability in favour of lactulose.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Constipation, dietary fibre and the control of large bowel functionPostgraduate Medical Journal, 1984
- Constipation: What Does the Patient Mean?Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 1984
- Treatment of Chronic Constipation by a Bulk-Forming Laxative (Fibrolax®)Journal of International Medical Research, 1983
- Functional bowel disorders in apparently healthy peopleGastroenterology, 1980
- Lactulose Syrup Assessed in a Double‐Blind Study of Elderly Constipated PatientsJournal of the American Geriatrics Society, 1978
- Variability of colonic function in healthy subjects.Gut, 1978
- EFFECT OF DIETARY FIBRE ON STOOLS AND TRANSIT-TIMES, AND ITS ROLE IN THE CAUSATION OF DISEASEThe Lancet, 1972
- Treatment of chronic constipation with lactulose syrup: results of a double-blind study.Gut, 1968
- Inability of the human small-intestinal lactase to hydrolyze lactuloseBiochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Enzymology and Biological Oxidation, 1965
- Variation of bowel habit in two population samples.BMJ, 1965