Do Inventories Matter In Dealership Markets? Evidence From the London Stock Exchange
Preprint
- 1 January 1997
- preprint
- Published by Elsevier in SSRN Electronic Journal
Abstract
Using London Stock Exchange data, we test the central implication of the canonical model of Ho and Stoll (1983) that relative inventory differences determine dealer behavior. We find that relative inventories explain which dealers obtain large trades and show that movements between best ask, best bid and straddle are highly correlated with both standardized and relative inventory changes. We show that the mean reversion in inventories is highly nonlinear and increasing in inventory levels. We show that a key determinant of variations in inter-dealer trading is inventories and that inter-dealer trading plays an important role in managing large inventory positions.Keywords
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- Preferencing, Internalization, Best Execution and Dealer ProfitsSSRN Electronic Journal, 1997
- Transparency and Liquidity: A Study of Block Trades on the London Stock Exchange under Different Publication RulesThe Journal of Finance, 1996
- Market Structure and the Intraday Pattern of Bid-Ask Spreads for NASDAQ SecuritiesThe Journal of Business, 1995
- Why Did NASDAQ Market Makers Stop Avoiding Odd‐Eighth Quotes?The Journal of Finance, 1994
- Why do NASDAQ Market Makers Avoid Odd‐Eighth Quotes?The Journal of Finance, 1994
- Price Formation and Equilibrium Liquidity in Fragmented and Centralized MarketsThe Journal of Finance, 1993
- Variations in Trading Volume, Return Volatility, and Trading Costs: Evidence on Recent Price Formation ModelsThe Journal of Finance, 1993
- Estimating the components of the bid/ask spreadJournal of Financial Economics, 1988
- Bid, ask and transaction prices in a specialist market with heterogeneously informed tradersJournal of Financial Economics, 1985
- Market microstructureJournal of Financial Economics, 1976