Laparoscopic Presacral Neurectomy vs Neurotomy: Use of the Argon Beam Coagulator Compared to Conventional Technique
- 1 January 1993
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Mary Ann Liebert Inc in Journal of Gynecologic Surgery
- Vol. 9 (3) , 169-173
- https://doi.org/10.1089/gyn.1993.9.169
Abstract
Presacral neurectomy is effective treatment for dysmenorrhea and midline pelvic pain. Conventional laparoscopic techniques describe retroperitoneal dissection to excise retroperitoneal nerve tissue. The argon beam coagulator (ABC) can be used laparoscopically to hemostatically ablate and thus separate the presacral tissues down to the periosteum without dissecting or excising tissue. In 32 patients undergoing laparoscopic presacral neurectomy, 17 were performed with conventional methods, and 15 patients underwent ABC neurotomy only, without dissection or excision. Postoperative pain reduction was the same in both groups (73% vs 75%), with average anesthesia time 64 min for ABC neurotomy vs 92 min with conventional techniques. One major vascular complication requiring immediate laparotomy occurred in the ABC group. When properly applied laparoscopically, the ABC is an effective tool to rapidly coagulate and separate the presacral nerves with minimal smoke, excellent visualization, and no retroperitoneal dissection. (J GYNECOL SURG 9:169, 1993)Keywords
This publication has 2 references indexed in Scilit:
- Pelvic endometriosis: Infertility and pelvic painAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1977
- Use of presacral sympathectomy in the treatment of dysmenorrheaAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1964