Treatment of Venous Thrombosis with Intravenous Unfractionated Heparin Administered in the Hospital as Compared with Subcutaneous Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin Administered at Home
- 14 March 1996
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 334 (11) , 682-687
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199603143341102
Abstract
An intravenous course of standard (unfractionated) heparin with the dose adjusted to prolong the activated partial-thromboplastin time to a desired length is the standard initial in-hospital treatment for patients with deep-vein thrombosis, but fixed-dose subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin appears to be as effective and safe. Because the latter treatment can be given on an outpatient basis, we compared the two treatments in symptomatic outpatients with proximal-vein thrombosis but no signs of pulmonary embolism. We randomly assigned patients to adjusted-dose intravenous standard heparin administered in the hospital (198 patients) or fixed-dose subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin administered at home, when feasible (202 patients). We compared the treatments with respect to recurrent venous thromboembolism, major bleeding, quality of life, and costs. Seventeen of the 198 patients who received standard heparin (8.6 percent) and 14 of the 202 patients who received low-molecular-weight heparin (6.9 percent) had recurrent thromboembolism (difference, 1.7 percentage points; 95 percent confidence interval, -3.6 to 6.9). Major bleeding occurred in four patients assigned to standard heparin (2.0 percent) and one patient assigned to low-molecular-weight heparin (0.5 percent; difference, 1.5 percentage points; 95 percent confidence interval, -0.7 to 2.7). Quality of life improved in both groups. Physical activity and social functioning were better in the patients assigned to low-molecular-weight heparin. Among the patients in that group, 36 percent were never admitted to the hospital at all, and 40 percent were discharged early. This treatment was associated with a mean reduction in hospital days of 67 percent, ranging from 29 percent to 86 percent in the various study centers. In patients with proximal-vein thrombosis, treatment with low-molecular-weight heparin at home is feasible, effective, and safe.Keywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Treatment of deep venous thrombosis with low-molecular-weight heparins. A meta-analysisArchives of internal medicine (1960), 1995
- THE MOS SHORT-FORM GENERAL HEALTH SURVEY: SINGLE ITEM VS MULTIPLE MEASURES OF HEALTH-RELATED QUALITY OF LIFE: SOME NUANCESPsychological Reports, 1992
- Comparison of subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin with intravenous standard heparin in proximal deep-vein thrombosisThe Lancet, 1992
- Quality of life measures for patients receiving adjuvant therapy for breast cancer: an international trialEuropean Journal Of Cancer, 1992
- The impact of long-term warfarin therapy on quality of life. Evidence from a randomized trial. Boston Area Anticoagulation Trial for Atrial Fibrillation InvestigatorsArchives of internal medicine (1960), 1991
- Economic Analysis Alongside Clinical Trials: Revisiting the Methodological IssuesInternational Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 1991
- Value of the ventilation/perfusion scan in acute pulmonary embolism. Results of the prospective investigation of pulmonary embolism diagnosis (PIOPED). The PIOPED InvestigatorsJAMA, 1990
- Heparin for 5 Days as Compared with 10 Days in the Initial Treatment of Proximal Venous ThrombosisNew England Journal of Medicine, 1990
- Continuous Intravenous Heparin Compared with Intermittent Subcutaneous Heparin in the Initial Treatment of Proximal-Vein ThrombosisNew England Journal of Medicine, 1986
- A Table of Exact Confidence Limits for Differences and Ratios of Two Proportions and Their Odds RatiosJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1977