Associations Between Hepatitis B Virus Mutations and the Risk of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 5 August 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Vol. 101 (15) , 1066-1082
- https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djp180
Abstract
The association between hepatitis B virus (HBV) mutations and hepatocarcinogenesis remains controversial because of conflicting data in the literature. We conducted a meta-analysis of case–control and cohort studies to examine HBV PreS, enhancer II (EnhII), basal core promoter (BCP), and precore mutations in relation to the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We searched databases for studies of these associations that were published in English or Chinese up to August 31, 2008. HBV mutation–specific odds ratios and relative risks were pooled by use of a random-effects model and stratified by potential confounders. All statistical tests were two-sided. Of the 43 studies included in this meta-analysis, 40 used a case–control design. The 43 studies evaluated a total of 11 582 HBV-infected participants, of whom 2801 had HCC. Statistically significant summary odds ratios of HCC were obtained for any PreS mutation (3.77, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.57 to 5.52), C1653T in EnhII (2.76, 95% CI = 2.09 to 3.64), T1753V (2.35, 95% CI = 1.63 to 3.40), and A1762T/G1764A in BCP (3.79, 95% CI = 2.71 to 5.29). PreS mutations were more strongly associated with an increased risk of HCC in subjects who were infected with HBV genotype C than in those who were infected with HBV genotype B, whereas the opposite was true for A1762T/G1764A. C1653T, T1753V, and A1762T/G1764A were more strongly associated with an increased risk of HCC in hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)–positive subjects than in HBeAg-negative subjects. PreS mutations, C1653T, T1753V, and A1762T/G1764A accumulated during the progression of chronic HBV infection from the asymptomatic carrier state to HCC (Ptrend < .001 for each mutation). PreS mutations, C1653T, C1653T + T1753V, and A1762T/G1764A-based combinations of mutations had specificities greater than 80% for the prediction of HCC. The precore mutations G1896A and C1858T were not associated with the risk of HCC, regardless of HBeAg status and HBV genotype. HBV PreS mutations, C1653T, T1753V, and A1762T/G1764A are associated with an increased risk of HCC. These mutations alone and in combination may be predictive for hepatocarcinogenesis.Keywords
This publication has 66 references indexed in Scilit:
- HBV A1762T, G1764A Mutations Are a Valuable Biomarker for Identifying a Subset of Male HBsAg Carriers at Extremely High Risk of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Prospective StudyAmerican Journal of Gastroenterology, 2008
- Associations Between Hepatitis B Virus Genotype and Mutants and the Risk of Hepatocellular CarcinomaJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2008
- Application of a Novel, Rapid, and Sensitive Oligonucleotide Ligation Assay for Detection of Cancer-Predicting Mutations in the Precore and Basal Core Promoter of Hepatitis B VirusJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2008
- Genotype-Specific Genomic Markers Associated with Primary Hepatomas, Based on Complete Genomic Sequencing of Hepatitis B VirusJournal of Virology, 2008
- Influence of Hepatitis B Virus X and Core Promoter Mutations on Hepatocellular Carcinoma among Patients Infected with Subgenotype C2Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 2007
- Basal core promoter T1762/A1764 and precore A1896 gene mutations in hepatitis B surface antigen‐positive hepatocellular carcinoma: a comparison with chronic carriersLiver International, 2007
- Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Epidemiology and Molecular CarcinogenesisGastroenterology, 2007
- Clinical and Virological Characteristics of Hepatitis B Virus Subgenotypes Ba, C1, and C2 in ChinaJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2007
- T1653 Mutation in the Box a Increases the Riskof Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis B Virus Genotype C InfectionClinical Infectious Diseases, 2006
- Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysisStatistics in Medicine, 2002