Comparison of review articles published in peer-reviewed and throwaway journals.
Open Access
- 5 June 2002
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in JAMA
- Vol. 287 (21) , 2853-2856
- https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.287.21.2853
Abstract
To compare the quality, presentation, readability, and clinical relevance of review articles published in peer-reviewed and "throwaway" journals.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Why Review Articles on the Health Effects of Passive Smoking Reach Different ConclusionsJAMA, 1998
- Locating and Appraising Systematic ReviewsAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1997
- Scientific quality of original research articles on environmental tobacco smokeTobacco Control, 1997
- How to keep up with the critical care literature and avoid being buried aliveCritical Care Medicine, 1996
- Too Many Words? Mozart 1, Emperor 0Published by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1995
- Agreement among reviewers of review articlesJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1991
- Validation of an index of the quality of review articlesPublished by Elsevier ,1991
- Throw it away, Sam: the controlled circulation journals.American Journal of Roentgenology, 1990
- The Medical Review Article: State of the ScienceAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1987
- A new readability yardstick.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1948