Should Patients Undergoing Chemotherapy and Radiotherapy Be Prescribed Antioxidants?
Open Access
- 1 March 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Integrative Cancer Therapies
- Vol. 5 (1) , 63-82
- https://doi.org/10.1177/1534735405285882
Abstract
In September 2005, CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians published a warning by Gabriella D’Andrea, MD, against the concurrent use of antioxidants with radiotherapy and chemotherapy. However, several deficiencies of the CA article soon became apparent, not least the selective omission of prominent studies that contradicted the author’s conclusions. While acknowledging that only large-scale, randomized trials could provide a valid basis for therapeutic recommendations, the author sometimes relied on laboratory rather than clinical data to support her claim that harm resulted from the concurrent use of antioxidants and chemotherapy. She also sometimes extrapolated from chemoprevention studies rather than those on the concurrent use of antioxidants per se. The article overstated the degree to which the laboratory data diverged in regard to the safety and efficacy of antioxidant therapy: in fact, the preponderance of data suggests a synergistic or at least harmless effect with most high-dose dietary antioxidants and chemotherapy. The practical recommendations made in the article to avoid the general class of antioxidants during chemotherapy are inconsistent, in that if antioxidants were truly a threat to the efficacy of standard therapy, antioxidant-rich foods, especially fruits and vegetables, ought also be proscribed during treatment. Yet no such recommendation is made. Furthermore, the wide-scale use by both medical and radiation oncologists of synthetic antioxidants (eg, amifostine) to control the adverse effects of cytotoxic treatments is similarly overlooked. In sum, this CA article is incomplete: there is far more information available regarding antioxidant supplements as an appropriate adjunctive cancer therapy than is acknowledged. Patients would be well advised to seek the opinion of physicians who are adequately trained and experienced in the intersection of 2 complex fields, that is, chemotherapeutics and nutritional oncology. Physicians whose goal is comprehensive cancer therapy should refer their patients to qualified integrative practitioners who have such training and expertise to guide patients. A blanket rejection of the concurrent use of antioxidants with chemotherapy is not justified by the preponderance of evidence at this time and serves neither the scientific community nor cancer patients.Keywords
This publication has 79 references indexed in Scilit:
- Why Most Published Research Findings Are FalsePLoS Medicine, 2005
- Orthomolecular Oncology Review: Ascorbic Acid and Cancer 25 Years LaterIntegrative Cancer Therapies, 2005
- Major healing of refractory mandible osteoradionecrosis after treatment combining pentoxifylline and tocopherol: A phase II trialHead & Neck, 2005
- 8-oxo-dG Elevated in Children During Leukemia TreatmentIntegrative Cancer Therapies, 2004
- Long-term sequelae after cancer therapyActa Oncologica, 2004
- Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Combined Pentoxifylline and Tocopherol for Regression of Superficial Radiation-Induced FibrosisJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2003
- High-Dose Vitamin C versus Placebo in the Treatment of Patients with Advanced Cancer Who Have Had No Prior ChemotherapyNew England Journal of Medicine, 1985
- Failure of High-Dose Vitamin C (Ascorbic Acid) Therapy to Benefit Patients with Advanced CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 1979
- Serial Assessment of Doxorubicin Cardiotoxicity with Quantitative Radionuclide AngiocardiographyNew England Journal of Medicine, 1979
- Causes of peptic ulcer: A selective epidemiologic reviewJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1967