RATE CHANGES AFTER UNSCHEDULED OMISSION AND PRESENTATION OF REINFORCEMENT
- 1 May 1971
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
- Vol. 15 (3) , 261-270
- https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1971.15-261
Abstract
Changes in response rate similar to frustration effects were studied in a two-lever situation. Responding on one lever on a fixed-interval schedule produced access to water for 5 sec and an exteroceptive stimulus. In the presence of this stimulus, responding on another lever on a fixed-interval schedule produced access to water for 5 sec and terminated the stimulus. Occasional omission of a previously scheduled reinforcer after responding on the first lever resulted consistently in increases in rate on the second lever during the immediately succeeding interval. In another procedure, occasional presentation of a previously unscheduled reinforcer after responding on the first lever resulted consistently in decreases in rate on the second lever during the immediately succeeding interval. Changes occurred after the first omissions or presentations and were about the same in magnitude as the procedure continued over several sessions. Typically, an increase or decrease in rate was maintained throughout an entire 100-sec interval. Changes in rate on the second lever of approximately the same magnitude also occurred when rate on the first lever was near-zero under a schedule that differentially reinforced behavior other than lever pressing.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- RELATIONS BETWEEN PATTERNS OF RESPONDING AND THE PRESENTATION OF STIMULI UNDER SECOND‐ORDER SCHEDULES1Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1969
- REINFORCEMENT OMISSION ON FIXED‐INTERVAL SCHEDULES1Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1969
- CONTIGUITY OF BRIEFLY PRESENTED STIMULI WITH FOOD REINFORCEMENT1Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1969
- PAUSE RELATIONSHIPS IN MULTIPLE AND CHAINED FIXED‐RATIO SCHEDULES1Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1968
- The “frustration effect” in operant studies: A necessary control procedurePsychonomic Science, 1967
- An effect analogous to “frustration” on interval reinforcement schedulesPsychonomic Science, 1966
- The Amsel frustration effect in monkeysPsychonomic Science, 1965
- RELATIVITY OF RESPONSE RATE AND REINFORCEMENT FREQUENCY IN A MULTIPLE SCHEDULE1Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1961
- The role of frustrative nonreward in noncontinuous reward situations.Psychological Bulletin, 1958
- Motivational properties of frustration: I. Effect on a running response of the addition of frustration to the motivational complex.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1952