IS UNIVERSAL SCREENING FOR HEPATITIS-B INFECTION WARRANTED IN ALL PRENATAL POPULATIONS
- 1 August 1989
- journal article
- editorial
- Vol. 74 (2) , 259-261
Abstract
The purpose of this prospective study was to determine the prevalence of asymptomatic hepatitis B infection in a low-risk, closely monitored population. At the time of their first prenatal evaluation, a cohort of active-duty military personnel and their dependents underwent screening for hepatitis B surface antigen. Ten of 1520 women (0.66%) tested positive. All of these women were Asians and would have been identified under a selective screening protocol. None of the ten seropositive patients had other risk factors for hepatitis B infection. We conclude that in this type of population, universal screening for hepatitis B is not cost-effective. Selective screening for high-risk patients would appear to be more appropriate.This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cost-effectiveness of prenatal screening and immunization for hepatitis B virusJAMA, 1988
- THE PREGNANT HEPATITIS-B CARRIER - EVIDENCE FAVORING COMPREHENSIVE ANTEPARTUM SCREENING1987
- Hepatitis B: A case for prenatal screening of all patientsAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1987
- Routine hepatitis screening in adolescent pregnancies: Is it cost effective?American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1987
- Prevalence of hepatitis B surface antigen among women receiving prenatal care at the Palm Beach County Health DepartmentAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1986
- FATAL HEPATITIS-B IN EARLY INFANCY - THE IMPORTANCE OF IDENTIFYING HBSAG-POSITIVE PREGNANT-WOMEN AND PROVIDING IMMUNOPROPHYLAXIS TO THEIR NEWBORNS1983
- PREVENTION OF CHRONIC HBsAG CARRIER STATE IN INFANTS OF HBsAG-POSITIVE MOTHERS BY HEPATITIS B IMMUNOGLOBULINThe Lancet, 1979
- Screening Hospital Patients for Hepatitis B Surface AntigenAmerican Journal of Clinical Pathology, 1977