Plasmodium falciparum in Kisumu, Kenya: Differences in Sensitivity to Amodiaquine and Chloroquine in Vitro
- 1 October 1983
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in The Journal of Infectious Diseases
- Vol. 148 (4) , 732-736
- https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/148.4.732
Abstract
Sensitivity to amodiaquine and chloroquine was examined in 11 Plasmodium falciparum isolates from Kisumu, Kenya, and three chloroquine-resistant parasites. All 11 Kisumu isolates were sensitive to amodiaquine in vivo. Six of 10 Kisumu isolates successfully tested were more sensitive to amodiaquine in a microtest (minimal inhibitory concentration [MIC], ⩽114 nM for amodiaquine vs 160 nM for chloroquine) and/or 48-hr in vitro tests (MIC, 60 nM for amodiaquine vs 100 nM for chloroquine). All nine successfully cultured Kisumu isolates had a lower 50% inhibitory dose (ID50) for amodiaquine (9.0–18.2 nM) than for chloroquine (24.9–75.4 nM) in a radioisotopic assay. Five were also more sensitive when retested in the 48-hr test. The chloroquine-resistant parasites had reduced in vitro sensitivity to chloroquine (ID50, ⩾103 nM; MIC, 300 nM) but not to amodiaquine (ID50, ⩽ 22 nM; MIC, ⩽100 nM). These data indicate that amodiaquine is more potent than chloroquine and should be evaluated for efficacy against P falciparum in areas where RI and RII chloroquine resistance occurs.Keywords
This publication has 1 reference indexed in Scilit:
- Human Malaria Parasites in Continuous CultureScience, 1976