Prediction of body density from skinfold thickness in elderly subjects: are the existing equations valid?
- 1 January 1994
- journal article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Annals of Human Biology
- Vol. 21 (6) , 613-616
- https://doi.org/10.1080/03014469400003622
Abstract
In 33 healthy elderly subjects, body density was measured using hydrodensitometry and predicted from the sum of four skinfold thicknesses. In the men, mean measured density was 1.045 kg/l and mean predicted density 1.041 kg/l, with bias and limits of agreement 0.004 (+/- 0.016) kg/l and 95% confidence interval (CI) for the difference 0.001-0.008 kg/l. In the women, mean measured density was 1.012 kg/l and mean predicted density 1.020 kg/l, and 95% CI for the difference was -0.016-0.000 kg/l. The bias was therefore in the opposite direction in women than men, and limits of agreement were wider (-0.008 +/- 0.030 kg/l) in the women. Biases in prediction of density lead to systematic error in estimation of body fatness in elderly subjects, and this systematic error is more likely to be of practical significance in women than men.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Advances in Body Composition AssessmentMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 1993
- Letters to the editorAnnals of Human Biology, 1993
- Four-component model for the assessment of body composition in humans: comparison with alternative methods, and evaluation of the density and hydration of fat-free massClinical Science, 1992
- Body composition and body hydration in old age estimated by means of skinfold thickness and deuterium dilutionAnnals of Human Biology, 1992
- Body composition in elderly people: effect of criterion estimates on predictive equationsThe American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 1991
- STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENTThe Lancet, 1986
- Body fat assessed from total body density and its estimation from skinfold thickness: measurements on 481 men and women aged from 16 to 72 YearsBritish Journal of Nutrition, 1974