Guides for Reading and Interpreting Systematic Reviews
- 1 August 1998
- journal article
- review article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine
- Vol. 152 (8) , 812-817
- https://doi.org/10.1001/archpedi.152.8.812
Abstract
Opinion from JAMA Pediatrics — Guides for Reading and Interpreting Systematic Reviews — II. How Did the Authors Find the Studies and Assess Their Quality?Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Assessing the Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials:Current Issues and Future DirectionsInternational Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 1996
- The Cochrane Collaboration. Preparing, maintaining, and disseminating systematic reviews of the effects of health careJAMA, 1995
- Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials: An annotated bibliography of scales and checklistsControlled Clinical Trials, 1995
- Searching the literature. Be systematic in your searching.BMJ, 1993
- Should unpublished data be included in meta-analyses? Current convictions and controversiesPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1993
- Bias in meta-analytic researchJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1992
- How study design affects outcomes in comparisons of therapy. I: MedicalStatistics in Medicine, 1989
- Reference bias in reports of drug trials.BMJ, 1987
- Why do we need systematic overviews of randomized trials? (Transcript of an oral presentation, modified by the editors)Statistics in Medicine, 1987
- Bias in Treatment Assignment in Controlled Clinical TrialsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1983