Abstract
A previous derivation of the generalized Auger transition for inner-shell multiplets is shown to be incorrect. The previous derivation was based on deducing a coupling scheme from 6j symbols in the transition-rate expression, then transforming the coupling coefficients. It was expected that the transformed transition rate would be correct up to a phase factor. It is shown here that this expectation is incorrect. The transformed transition-rate expression is structurally incorrect (i.e., incorrect irrespective of phase factor). Correct expressions are obtained by direct manipulation of 6j and 9j symbols. It is shown that the correct expression can be found using the coupling transformation provided a modified matrix element expression is used.

This publication has 2 references indexed in Scilit: