National guidelines, clinical trials, and quality of evidence.
- 25 September 2000
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in Archives of internal medicine (1960)
- Vol. 160 (17) , 2577-2580
- https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.160.17.2577
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Hazards of Scoring the Quality of Clinical Trials for Meta-analysisJAMA, 1999
- British Hypertension Society guidelines for hypertension management 1999: summaryBMJ, 1999
- Gemfibrozil for the Secondary Prevention of Coronary Heart Disease in Men with Low Levels of High-Density Lipoprotein CholesterolNew England Journal of Medicine, 1999
- Effect of angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibition compared with conventional therapy on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in hypertension: the Captopril Prevention Project (CAPPP) randomised trialThe Lancet, 1999
- Effects of intensive blood-pressure lowering and low-dose aspirin in patients with hypertension: principal results of the Hypertension Optimal Treatment (HOT) randomised trialThe Lancet, 1998
- Randomised double-blind comparison of placebo and active treatment for older patients with isolated systolic hypertensionThe Lancet, 1997
- Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trialsJAMA, 1995
- Recruitment in the Hypertension Detection and Follow-up ProgramControlled Clinical Trials, 1987
- Effect of stepped care treatment on the incidence of myocardial infarction and angina pectoris. 5-Year findings of the hypertension detection and follow-up program.Hypertension, 1984
- UK HEART DISEASE PREVENTION PROJECT: INCIDENCE AND MORTALITY RESULTSThe Lancet, 1983