Mixed Messages: Referees' Comments on the Manuscripts They Review
- 1 December 1989
- journal article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in The Sociological Quarterly
- Vol. 30 (4) , 639-654
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.1989.tb01540.x
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Do Journal Rejection Rates Index Consensus?American Sociological Review, 1988
- How hard is hard science, how soft is soft science? The empirical cumulativeness of research.American Psychologist, 1987
- Who Complains to Journal Editors and What HappensSociological Inquiry, 1986
- Interrater agreement for journal manuscript reviews.American Psychologist, 1984
- Statistics in Society: Problems Unsolved and UnformulatedJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1981
- Reliability of reviews for the American Psychologist: A biostatistical assessment of the data.American Psychologist, 1980
- Which researcher will get the grant?Nature, 1979
- Reasons for Journal Rejection: An Analysis of 600 ManuscriptsPs, 1978
- The Structure of Scientific Fields and the Allocation of Editorships on Scientific Journals: Some Observations on the Politics of KnowledgeThe Sociological Quarterly, 1974
- The Structure of Scientific Fields and the Functioning of University Graduate DepartmentsAmerican Sociological Review, 1972