Autocorrelation of Location Estimates and the Analysis of Radiotracking Data
- 1 July 1999
- journal article
- research article
- Published by JSTOR in The Journal of Wildlife Management
- Vol. 63 (3) , 1039-1044
- https://doi.org/10.2307/3802819
Abstract
The wildlife literature has been contradictory about the importance of autocorrelation in radiotracking data used for home range estimation and hypothesis tests of habitat selection. By definition, tire concept of a home range involves autocorrelated movements, but estimates or hypothesis tests based on sampling designs that predefine a time frame of interest, and that generate representative samples of an animal's movement during this time frame, should not be affected by length of the sampling interval and autocorrelation. Intensive sampling of the individual's home range and habitat use during the time frame of the study leads to improved estimates for the individual,but use of location estimates as the sample unit to compare across animals is pseudoreplication. We therefore recommend against use of habitat selection analysis techniques that use locations instead of individuals as the sample unit. We offer a general outline for sampling designs for radiotracking studies.Keywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effects of Sample Size on Kernel Home Range EstimatesThe Journal of Wildlife Management, 1999
- An Evaluation of the Accuracy of Kernel Density Estimators for Home Range AnalysisEcology, 1996
- Using Monte Carlo Simulation to Evaluate Kernel-Based Home Range EstimatorsThe Journal of Wildlife Management, 1995
- Kernel Methods for Estimating the Utilization Distribution in Home‐Range StudiesEcology, 1989