A new strategy for estimating risks of transfusion‐transmitted viral infections based on rates of detection of recently infected donors
Top Cited Papers
- 19 January 2005
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Transfusion
- Vol. 45 (2) , 254-264
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1537-2995.2004.04215.x
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Estimates for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)‐1 and hepatitis C virus (HCV) transfusion‐transmitted risks have relied on incidence derived from repeat donor histories and imprecise estimates for infectious, preseroconversion window periods (WPs).STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: By use of novel approaches, WPs were estimated by back‐extrapolation of acute viral replication dynamics. Incidence was derived from the yield of viremic, antibody‐negative donations detected by routine minipool nucleic acid testing (MP‐NAT) of 37 million US donations (1999‐2002) or from sensitive/less‐sensitive HIV‐1 enzyme immunoassay (S/LS‐EIA) results for seropositive samples from 6.5 million donations (1999). Incidences and WPs were combined to calculate risks and project yield of individual donation (ID)‐NAT.RESULTS: The HIV‐1 WP from presumed infectivity (1 copy/20 mL) to ID‐NAT detection was estimated at 5.6 days, and the periods from ID to MP‐NAT detection and from MP‐NAT to p24 detection at 3.4 and 6.0 days, respectively; corresponding estimates for HCV were 4.9, 2.5, and 50.9 days (the latter represents period from MP‐NAT to HCV antibody detection). The HIV‐1 incidence projected from MP‐NAT yield or from S/LS‐EIA data was 1.8 per 100,000 person‐years, resulting in a corresponding HIV‐1 transfusion‐transmitted risk of 1 in 2.3 million. The HCV incidence from MP‐NAT yield was 2.70 per 100,000 person‐years with a corresponding risk of 1 in 1.8 million donations. Conversion from MP‐NAT to ID‐NAT was projected to detect two to three additional HIV‐1 and HCV infectious units annually.CONCLUSIONS: MP‐NAT yield and S/LS‐EIA rates can accurately project transfusion risks. HCV and HIV‐1 risks, currently estimated at 1 per 2 million units, could be reduced to 1 in 3 to 4 million units by ID‐NAT screening.Keywords
This publication has 47 references indexed in Scilit:
- Evaluation of a Sensitive/Less Sensitive Testing Algorithm Using the bioMérieux Vironostika-LS Assay for Detecting Recent HIV-1 Subtype B' or E Infection in ThailandAIDS Research and Human Retroviruses, 2003
- Highly Sensitive Multiplex Assay for Detection of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 and Hepatitis C Virus RNAJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2002
- Quantitative Detection of Increasing HIV Type 1 Antibodies after Seroconversion: A Simple Assay for Detecting Recent HIV Infection and Estimating IncidenceAIDS Research and Human Retroviruses, 2002
- NAT and blood safety: what is the paradigm?Transfusion, 2000
- Transfusion medicine in developing countriesTransfusion Medicine Reviews, 2000
- Results of Viral Marker Screening of Unpaid Blood Donations and Probability of Window Period Donations in 1997Vox Sanguinis, 2000
- Risk factors for hepatitis C virus infection in United States blood donorsHepatology, 2000
- The incidence/window period model and its use to assess the risk of transfusion-transmitted human immunodeficiency virus and hepatitis C virus infectionTransfusion Medicine Reviews, 1997
- Estimates of infectious disease risk factors in US blood donors. Retrovirus Epidemiology Donor StudyPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1997
- Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 ‐infected blood donors:behavioral characteristics and reasons for donationTransfusion, 1991