Policy and practice reviews

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Environmental planners and managers may want to do their work without political interference, using rational and objective knowledge only. They may also want to serve the common good, be accountable and encourage public participation. This paper explores the tensions between the two approaches and argues that a great deal of politics goes into the very definition and selection of what is considered rational and objective. Too often policy‐makers claim to rely exclusively on objective scientific or economic knowledge, while ignoring other forms of knowledge which may be as essential for the solution or management of the problem. Difficult choices have to be made, and it may well be the political scientist, sociologist or psychologist who can help. Expertise has its own interest in the policy process—it is mainly concerned with perpetuating itself and the search for more knowledge. To be effective as well as rational, environmental managers need to be aware of a broad range of useful knowledge, as well as suspicious of claims that promise too much. They need to be in open communication with society, and this may well require institutional reform.