Effects of sex of defense attorney, sex of juror, and age and attractiveness of the victim on mock juror decision making in a rape case
- 1 August 1983
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in Sex Roles
- Vol. 9 (8) , 879-889
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00289961
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Attitudes toward rape: A comparative analysis of police, rapists, crisis counselors, and citizens.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1978
- Victim consequences, sentence severity, and decision processes in mock juriesOrganizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1977
- Changes in group members' decision preferences during discussion: An illustration with mock juries.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1976
- Penalties for Rape as a Function of Victim Provocativeness, Damage, and ResistanceJournal of Applied Social Psychology, 1976
- Role and justice considerations in the attribution of responsibility to a rape victimJournal of Research in Personality, 1976
- Guilt beyond a reasonable doubt: Effects of concept definition and assigned decision rule on the judgments of mock jurors.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1976
- The decision processes of 6- and 12-person mock juries assigned unanimous and two-thirds majority rules.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1975
- The Effect of Several Types of Pretrial Publicity on the Guilt Attributions of Simulated Jurors1Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1973
- Attribution of fault to a rape victim as a function of respectability of the victim.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1973
- Observer's reaction to the "innocent victim": Compassion or rejection?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1966