Identity Conflict or Adaptive Flexibility?

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
A definition of bisexuality is offered, followed by a discussion of two opposing models of bisexual functioning: (1) the “conflict model,” which views bisexuality as problematic, stemming form identity conflict and confusion that marks a transitional stage to a homosexual orientation; and (2) the “flexibility model,” which views bisexuality as the coexistence of heteroeroticism and homoeroticism, as the successful integration of homosexual and heterosexual identities into a dual sexual orientation. The Kinsey data are reviewed in an effort to determine the incidence of bisexuality in the U.S. population. Finally, specific clinical and empirical studies investigating bisexual subjects are reviewed in light of the two models.

This publication has 0 references indexed in Scilit: