Reproductive Technologies and the Risk of Birth Defects
Top Cited Papers
- 10 May 2012
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 366 (19) , 1803-1813
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1008095
Abstract
The extent to which birth defects after infertility treatment may be explained by underlying parental factors is uncertain. We linked a census of treatment with assisted reproductive technology in South Australia to a registry of births and terminations with a gestation period of at least 20 weeks or a birth weight of at least 400 g and registries of birth defects (including cerebral palsy and terminations for defects at any gestational period). We compared risks of birth defects (diagnosed before a child's fifth birthday) among pregnancies in women who received treatment with assisted reproductive technology, spontaneous pregnancies (i.e., without assisted conception) in women who had a previous birth with assisted conception, pregnancies in women with a record of infertility but no treatment with assisted reproductive technology, and pregnancies in women with no record of infertility. Of the 308,974 births, 6163 resulted from assisted conception. The unadjusted odds ratio for any birth defect in pregnancies involving assisted conception (513 defects, 8.3%) as compared with pregnancies not involving assisted conception (17,546 defects, 5.8%) was 1.47 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.33 to 1.62); the multivariate-adjusted odds ratio was 1.28 (95% CI, 1.16 to 1.41). The corresponding odds ratios with in vitro fertilization (IVF) (165 birth defects, 7.2%) were 1.26 (95% CI, 1.07 to 1.48) and 1.07 (95% CI, 0.90 to 1.26), and the odds ratios with intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) (139 defects, 9.9%) were 1.77 (95% CI, 1.47 to 2.12) and 1.57 (95% CI, 1.30 to 1.90). A history of infertility, either with or without assisted conception, was also significantly associated with birth defects. The increased risk of birth defects associated with IVF was no longer significant after adjustment for parental factors. The risk of birth defects associated with ICSI remained increased after multivariate adjustment, although the possibility of residual confounding cannot be excluded. (Funded by the National Health and Medical Research Council and the Australian Research Council.)This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Risk of birth defects increased in pregnancies conceived by assisted human reproductionFertility and Sterility, 2009
- Assisted reproductive technology and major structural birth defects in the United StatesHuman Reproduction, 2009
- Infertility, infertility treatment, and congenital malformations: Danish national birth cohortBMJ, 2006
- Risk of birth defects among children conceived with assisted reproductive technology: providing an epidemiologic context to the dataFertility and Sterility, 2005
- Assisted reproductive technologies and the risk of birth defects—a systematic reviewHuman Reproduction, 2005
- In vitro fertilization (IVF) in Sweden: Risk for congenital malformations after different IVF methodsBirth Defects Research Part A: Clinical and Molecular Teratology, 2005
- A Meta-Analysis of Controlled Studies Comparing Major Malformation Rates in IVF and ICSI Infants with Naturally Conceived ChildrenJournal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 2004
- Birth defects in children conceived by ICSI compared with children conceived by other IVF-methods; a meta-analysisInternational Journal of Epidemiology, 2004
- Safety issues in assisted reproduction technology: The children of assisted reproduction confront the responsible conduct of assisted reproductive technologiesHuman Reproduction, 2002
- The Risk of Major Birth Defects after Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection and in Vitro FertilizationNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002