The Politics of Medical Quality: Auditing Doctors in the UK and the USA
- 1 February 1993
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Health Services Management Research
- Vol. 6 (1) , 24-34
- https://doi.org/10.1177/095148489300600103
Abstract
Following the 1989 white paper Working for patients medical audit has emerged as the principal officially-approved means of assuring the quality of NHS medical care. Beneath the surface consensus, however, significant arguments continue concerning both the purposes and the character of such audit. A ‘medical model’ of medical audit is in competition with a more managerial approach, while consumer interests, however unsuccessfully, are also trying to claim a role. Comparison with the system of peer review in the USA indicates that medical audit in the NHS is likely to be particularly weak with respect to public accountability. Nevertheless, when taken together with other features of the white paper's proposals, the universalization of medical audit offers managers an opportunity to begin to constrain the behaviour of hospital doctors at the local level.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Just ManagingPublished by Springer Nature ,1992
- GENERAL MANAGEMENT IN THE NHS: THE INITIAL IMPACT 1983–88Public Administration, 1991
- NHS profile. Enter the men from the Audit Commission. Interview by Richard Smith.BMJ, 1990
- Resource Management in the National Health Service: a first case historyPolicy & Politics, 1990
- Professional audit; quality control; keeping up to dateBaillière's Clinical Anaesthesiology, 1988
- Managing the National Health ServicePublished by Springer Nature ,1988
- Small Area Analysis: A Review and Analysis of the North American LiteratureJournal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 1987
- Capturing Quality?: The Quality Issue in British and American Health PoliciesJournal of Public Policy, 1987
- Monitoring the National Health ServiceProceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine, 1973