Eliminating Waste and Inefficiency Can Do Little to Contain Costs
- 1 January 1994
- journal article
- Published by Health Affairs (Project Hope) in Health Affairs
- Vol. 13 (1) , 224-238
- https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.13.1.224
Abstract
This study estimates potential savings from eliminating waste and inefficiency in the acute care sector (hospital, physician, and pharmaceutical). Our analysis indicates that in the unlikely event that all potential savings are achieved between 1994 and 2000, the rise in costs would be reduced by about 1.5 percentage points annually. This would slow the real rise in costs from a projected rate of 6.5 percent to 5 percent annually. Covering the uninsured would partially offset these savings and bring the rise in costs to more than 5.5 percent annually. If our estimate of potential efficiency savings is in error by plus or minus 50 percent, the projected rise in costs would be altered by about one percentage point. We conclude that savings from eliminating inefficiency are likely to fall far short of the Clinton administration's cost containment goals.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Administrative Costs in U.S. HospitalsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1993
- The Effects of Aging and Population Growth on Health Care CostsHealth Affairs, 1993
- Potential Public Expenditures Under Managed CompetitionHealth Affairs, 1993
- Hidden overhead costs: is Canada's system really less expensive?Health Affairs, 1992
- O Canada: do we expect too much from its health system?Health Affairs, 1992
- Why Managed Care Cannot Contain Hospital Costs—Without RationingHealth Affairs, 1992
- Have Hospital Inpatient Cost Containment Programs Contributed to the Growth in Outpatient Expenditures?Medical Care, 1991
- Hospital Cost Containment in the 1980sNew England Journal of Medicine, 1991
- Why There Will Be Little or No Physician Surplus between Now and the Year 2000New England Journal of Medicine, 1988
- Duplicated Hospital FacilitiesNew England Journal of Medicine, 1980