Response to mesna, doxorubicin, ifosfamide, and dacarbazine in 108 patients with metastatic or unresectable sarcoma and no prior chemotherapy.
- 1 September 1989
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) in Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Vol. 7 (9) , 1208-1216
- https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.1989.7.9.1208
Abstract
In this phase II trial, 105 eligible patients with no prior chemotherapy and advanced sarcoma received doxorubicin, ifosfamide, and dacarbazine (DTIC) with mesna uroprotection (MAID). Starting doses of these drugs were 60, 7,500, and 900 mg/m2 divided over 72 hours by continuous infusion, respectively. Mesna was given for 84 to 96 hours at 2,500 mg/m2/d. Myelosuppression was dose limiting, causing the only toxic death (sepsis). Nonhematologic toxicity consisted predominantly of anorexia and vomiting. Severe mucositis, macroscopic hematuria, renal tubular acidosis, renal failure, and CNS toxicity occurred in less than 5% of cycles. No cardiotoxicity was detected. The overall response rate (10% complete response [CR]) was 47% (95% confidence intervals, 5% to 18% and 37% to 57%, respectively). Most responses (approximately 70%) were observed within two cycles. Median times to progression were 10 and 9 months, respectively. Histologic high tumor grade, lesions less than 5 cm, and less than 1 year from diagnosis to study entry correlated with the probability of response. The median survival was 16 months. Time from diagnosis to study entry, performance status, and extent of disease, but not histologic grade, correlated with survival. Following CR, two patients remain disease-free at 32 and 16 months. Of the 15 additional patients rendered disease-free with surgery, two remain disease-free at 30 and 18 months with no further therapy. While most relapses occurred in sites of prior involvement, death from CNS metastases occurred in 11 of the 80 patients with high-grade sarcomas, of whom seven were still responding systematically (three complete responders). Because of its substantial response in this phase II trial, the MAID regimen is being compared with doxorubicin and DTIC alone in advanced sarcomas and to observation in the adjuvant treatment of high-grade sarcomas in randomized trials.This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Treatment of recurrent or advanced uterine sarcoma. A randomized trial of doxorubicinVersus doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (a phase III trial of the gynecologic oncology group)Cancer, 1985
- PHASE-II TRIAL OF IFOSFAMIDE WITH MESNA IN PREVIOUSLY TREATED METASTATIC SARCOMA1985
- Cyvadic in advanced soft tissue sarcoma: A randomized study comparing two schedules: A study of the EORTC soft tissue and bone sarcoma groupCancer, 1984
- A randomized study of adriamycin with and without dimethyl triazenoimidazole carboxamide in advanced uterine sarcomasCancer, 1983
- PLASMA PHARMACOKINETICS OF ADRIAMYCIN AND ADRIAMYCINOL - IMPLICATIONS FOR THE DESIGN OF INVITRO EXPERIMENTS AND TREATMENT PROTOCOLS1983
- A comparison of adriamycin versus vincristine and adriamycin, and cyclophosphamide versus vincristine, actinomycin-D, and cyclophosphamide for advanced sarcomaCancer, 1982
- Reduction of Doxorubicin Cardiotoxicity by Prolonged Continuous Intravenous InfusionAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1982
- IMVP-16 - AN EFFECTIVE REGIMEN FOR PATIENTS WITH LYMPHOMA WHO HAVE RELAPSED AFTER INITIAL COMBINATION CHEMOTHERAPY1982
- Protected environment–Prophylactic antibiotic program for malignant sarcomas: Randomized trial during remission induction chemotherapyCancer, 1981
- CHEMOTHERAPY OF SARCOMAThe Lancet, 1978