A cross-cultural analysis of the behavior of women and men: Implications for the origins of sex differences.
Top Cited Papers
- 1 January 2002
- journal article
- review article
- Published by American Psychological Association (APA) in Psychological Bulletin
- Vol. 128 (5) , 699-727
- https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.128.5.699
Abstract
This article evaluates theories of the origins of sex differences in human behavior. It reviews the cross-cultural evidence on the behavior of women and men in nonindustrial societies, especially the activities that contribute to the sex-typed division of labor ant patriarchy. To explain the cross-cultural findings, the authors consider social constructionism, evolutionary psychology, and their own biosocial theory. Supporting the. biosocial analysis, sex differences, derive from the interaction. between the physical specialization of the sexes, especially female reproductive capacity, and the economic and social structural aspects of societies. This biosocial approach treats the psychological attributes of women and men as emergent given the evolved characteristics of the sexes, their developmental experiences, and their situated activity in society.Keywords
This publication has 155 references indexed in Scilit:
- Changes in women's assertiveness in response to status and roles: A cross-temporal meta-analysis, 1931–1993.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2001
- Cooperative Reproduction in Ituri Forest Hunter‐Gatherers: Who Cares for Efe Infants?Current Anthropology, 2000
- Biobehavioral responses to stress in females: Tend-and-befriend, not fight-or-flight.Psychological Review, 2000
- Reproductive Freedom, Educational Equality, and Females' Preference for Resource-Acquisition Characteristics in MatesPsychological Science, 1999
- Culture and the evolution of social learningEvolution and Human Behavior, 1997
- A Role for Children in Hominid EvolutionMan, 1987
- Matrilineal inheritance: New theory and analysisBehavioral and Brain Sciences, 1985
- Sexual Division of Labor in AgricultureAmerican Anthropologist, 1984
- a model of the sexual division of laborAmerican Ethnologist, 1977
- Comparative Data on the Division of Labor By SexSocial Forces, 1937