Trends in use of coronary angiography in subacute phase of myocardial infarction.
- 1 September 1991
- journal article
- abstracts
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Circulation
- Vol. 84 (3) , 1004-1015
- https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.84.3.1004
Abstract
BACKGROUND Most patients do not undergo acute reperfusion after myocardial infarction, and which of these patients should undergo coronary angiography is still debated. METHODS AND RESULTS We analyzed the 1-year clinical outcomes and rates of coronary angiography performed as late as 60 days after myocardial infarction in 3,804 patients admitted between 1979 and 1988 and followed in six different centers. Patients less than 75 years old were classified into low-, medium-, and high-risk groups using a multivariate analysis of historical and clinical variables gathered during the first 8 hospital days. Patients who underwent early reperfusion (17%, all after 1984) were analyzed separately. To analyze time trends, patients were compared before and after mid-1984. Mortalities from day 9 through 1 year were similar for the two time periods in the low- (3.3% versus 2.5%) and medium-risk (7.4% versus 5.6%) groups, but mortality was lower for the high-risk group after 1984 (31.6% versus 20.0%). The proportion of patients undergoing coronary angiography increased dramatically in each group after 1984 (low risk, 18% versus 48%; medium risk, 23% versus 49%; high risk, 10% versus 32%, before and after 1984, respectively). Furthermore, a large percentage of patients (more than 40%) in the low-risk group did not have at least one of the indications for coronary angiography recently recommended by a joint task force. Among patients undergoing coronary angiography, the proportion of patients with three-vessel coronary artery disease decreased after 1984, whereas the proportion undergoing mechanical revascularization in the year after infarction increased in all risk groups. CONCLUSIONS Despite the recent development of noninvasive techniques with high sensitivity for detecting high-risk patients after myocardial infarction, coronary angiography is being performed increasingly in all patients, including those determined to be at low risk for complications based on clinical data. The economic consequences of such a trend could be considerable, and its impact requires careful analysis.Keywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparison of Invasive and Conservative Strategies after Treatment with Intravenous Tissue Plasminogen Activator in Acute Myocardial InfarctionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1989
- Risk stratification after acute myocardial infarction by means of exercise two-dimensional echocardiographyAmerican Heart Journal, 1987
- Reversibility of Cardiac Wall-Motion Abnormalities Predicted by Positron TomographyNew England Journal of Medicine, 1986
- Identification and Treatment of Low-Risk Patients after Acute Myocardial Infarction and Coronary-Artery Bypass Graft SurgeryNew England Journal of Medicine, 1986
- A Randomized Trial of Coronary Artery Bypass SurgeryNew England Journal of Medicine, 1985
- Evaluation of patients with acute myocardial infarction: Which test, for whom and why?American Heart Journal, 1985
- Prediction of late mortality after myocardial infarction from variables measured at different times during hospitalizationThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1983
- Risk Stratification and Survival after Myocardial InfarctionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1983
- Evaluation of Patients after Acute Myocardial InfarctionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1982
- Prognostic Value of Exercise Testing Soon after Myocardial InfarctionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1979